DHP484 New Compact Brushless – Comparison Pictures

Archived from the Tools In Action forum (Makita). This thread is read-only.

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

Hello all !

 

I just received Makita’s new compacts yesterday. Atleast the hammer drill model 🙂

 

Here are some comparison pictures between the old model DHP480  and the new DHP484 

 

On the left side:  Old DHP480

Photo from the original forum

 

On the Right side:   New DHP484

Photo from the original forum

We see a much higher speed. 2000 rpm’s against the old 1550 and an aluminium gear housing instead of plastic 🙂

 

Size comparison in height:

 Photo from the original forum

 

The new DHP484 is noticably shorter.  About 2 centimetrers 🙂

 

Size comparison from the back:

Photo from the original forum

 

Also here we see the body of the new DHP484 is slimmer 🙂

 

Size comparison from the top:

 

Photo from the original forum

Now the new Model is on the Left of course.  We see it’s alot shorter again but a littlebit bigger in the Width?

 

And finaly a weight comparison:

 

Photo from the original forum

Photo from the original forum

 

5 Grams heavier ! 😀

All in all very good upgrades 🙂  

 

 

Makita_2233Member since Aug 2016

kornomaniac wrote:

9 hours ago, kornomaniac said:

Hello all !

 

I just received Makita’s new compacts yesterday. Atleast the hammer drill model 🙂

 

Here are some comparison pictures between the old model DHP480  and the new DHP484 

 

On the left side:  Old DHP480

Photo from the original forum

 

On the Right side:   New DHP484

Photo from the original forum

We see a much higher speed. 2000 rpm’s against the old 1550 and an aluminium gear housing instead of plastic 🙂

 

Size comparison in height:

 Photo from the original forum

 

The new DHP484 is noticably shorter.  About 2 centimetrers 🙂

 

Size comparison from the back:

Photo from the original forum

 

Also here we see the body of the new DHP484 is slimmer 🙂

 

Size comparison from the top:

 

Photo from the original forum

Now the new Model is on the Left of course.  We see it’s alot shorter again but a littlebit bigger in the Width?

 

And finaly a weight comparison:

 

Photo from the original forum

Photo from the original forum

 

5 Grams heavier ! 😀

All in all very good upgrades 🙂  

 

 

This is the new BL hammer model  in Australia DHP483Z

 

 

Photo from the original forum

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

Yeah thats the petite Tiny one 🙂 

Only have the normal drill driver version of that one  DDF483   in the store 🙂

JimboS1iceMember since Sep 2015

It is small, not a fan of compact hammers, I used it on my m12 Fuel once and wish I never even did that


Jimbo

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

AndriusMember since Aug 2014

Thank for comparison,  nice new drill 🙂

rrich1Member since Jun 2015

can you compare it to the sizes of the 12v cxt brushless and non brushless drills? depending on the size it would keep me from diving into the 12v platform. 

ChrisKMember since Dec 2012

Great stuff @kornomaniac

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

rrich1 wrote:

11 hours ago, rrich1 said:

can you compare it to the sizes of the 12v cxt brushless and non brushless drills? depending on the size it would keep me from diving into the 12v platform. 

I could but I got my Vacation right now 😀 Will be halfway september 🙂

rrich1Member since Jun 2015

kornomaniac wrote:

3 hours ago, kornomaniac said:

I could but I got my Vacation right now 😀 Will be halfway september 🙂

ill wait 😀

BremonMember since Dec 2014

JimboS1ice wrote:

On August 29, 2016 at 4:49 PM, JimboS1ice said:

It is small, not a fan of compact hammers, I used it on my m12 Fuel once and wish I never even did that


Jimbo

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed Jimbo. It’s a task that they’re not really well suited to, and they add a bit of weight and length to a tool that otherwise focuses on how light and compact they are. Compact drill/drivers: fantastic.

Makita_2233Member since Aug 2016

JimboS1ice wrote:

On 30 August 2016 at 8:49 AM, JimboS1ice said:

It is small, not a fan of compact hammers, I used it on my m12 Fuel once and wish I never even did that


Jimbo

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why is that ? 

Makita_2233Member since Aug 2016

Bremon wrote:

4 hours ago, Bremon said:

Agreed Jimbo. It’s a task that they’re not really well suited to, and they add a bit of weight and length to a tool that otherwise focuses on how light and compact they are. Compact drill/drivers: fantastic.

One the makita BL cxt 12v max the hammer adds 14mm to the overall length and bugger all weight. Comparing it to the BL drill/drive 

jeffmcmillanMember since Jun 2015

14mm is a decent bit for such a compact drill meant for tight spaces

 

The problem with compact hammer drills is the same as larger hammer drills just worse.  If I could always have an SDS drill on hand and never tough a hammer drill again I’d be happier.

BremonMember since Dec 2014

Makita_2233 wrote:

6 hours ago, Makita_2233 said:

One the makita BL cxt 12v max the hammer adds 14mm to the overall length and bugger all weight. Comparing it to the BL drill/drive 

That’s still over half an inch on a tool that’s meant to be minuscule, and likely not very much fun to drill concrete with. I’m not calling out Makita on this; basically all hammer drills add that amount of length. When you’re using a full size drill it doesn’t matter as much. 

ChrisKMember since Dec 2012

Truthfully, the more I look at it, it is amazing that they can put a functioning hammer mechanism in shuck a short package. Kudos there, kind of like the newer Bosch brushless EC Tech that will hopefully appear pretty soon.

Makita_2233Member since Aug 2016

jeffmcmillan wrote:

11 hours ago, jeffmcmillan said:

14mm is a decent bit for such a compact drill meant for tight spaces

 

The problem with compact hammer drills is the same as larger hammer drills just worse.  If I could always have an SDS drill on hand and never tough a hammer drill again I’d be happier.

 

Bremon wrote:

6 hours ago, Bremon said:

That’s still over half an inch on a tool that’s meant to be minuscule, and likely not very much fun to drill concrete with. I’m not calling out Makita on this; basically all hammer drills add that amount of length. When you’re using a full size drill it doesn’t matter as much. 

Sometimes an sds is not really suitable, too much impact joules. An example of where a small compact hammer would be good, installing wall plugs in a house with old brick ( soft brick ) and the dill dia is only 6mm or 1/4 

jeffmcmillanMember since Jun 2015

Makita_2233 wrote:

2 hours ago, Makita_2233 said:

Sometimes an sds is not really suitable, too much impact joules. An example of where a small compact hammer would be good, installing wall plugs in a house with old brick ( soft brick ) and the dill dia is only 6mm or 1/4 

Every reputable manufacturer I can think of makes a small, high rpm, low impact energy rotary hammer for small holes and softer materials.  If it’s hard enough that I can’t use a twist bit, I want a rotary hammer.

BremonMember since Dec 2014

I agree with Jeff. The M12 Fuel is an awesome little unit, for example, and if I drilled small anchors regularly I’d buy the right tool for the job. 

KnarlyCarlMember since Jan 2016

Bremon wrote:

37 minutes ago, Bremon said:

I agree with Jeff. The M12 Fuel is an awesome little unit, for example, and if I drilled small anchors regularly I’d buy the right tool for the job. 

Ah, the M12 rotary? i had to do a double take because I first thought you were talking about the drill

BremonMember since Dec 2014

No I’m not as big a fan of those lol. The small SDS is pretty awesome though

Makita_2233Member since Aug 2016

Bremon wrote:

59 minutes ago, Bremon said:

I agree with Jeff. The M12 Fuel is an awesome little unit, for example, and if I drilled small anchors regularly I’d buy the right tool for the job. 

I agree on that. What I was getting at if you don’t drill small anchors regularly a hammer drill will get the job done for a few holes around the house 

Makita_2233Member since Aug 2016

jeffmcmillan wrote:

1 hour ago, jeffmcmillan said:

Every reputable manufacturer I can think of makes a small, high rpm, low impact energy rotary hammer for small holes and softer materials.  If it’s hard enough that I can’t use a twist bit, I want a rotary hammer.

Yeah I know and thought about buying the m12 rotay hammer for small holes but I only drill 7mm and below diameter holes a few times a year. I mostly drill 12mm-28mm and got the makita BL rotary hammer, the milwaukee  m18chp and a few corded hilti’s

BremonMember since Dec 2014

Makita_2233 wrote:

27 minutes ago, Makita_2233 said:

I agree on that. What I was getting at if you don’t drill small anchors regularly a hammer drill will get the job done for a few holes around the house 

Yeah, the majority of my drills are hammer drills for the same reason but I’ll likely transition to hammer-less compacts and leave the hammer function on my full size units. 

danielicrazyMember since Apr 2016

is this drill out in canada?  What would the code be?  I wish makita would make their model numbers easier.

danielicrazyMember since Apr 2016

How do you like this drill so far?
  It seems to have very similar dimensions to the new ultra compact, just with a bit more oumph.  Still for the size, i’m surprised they couldn’t get more torque in there seeing as the new milwaukee is also about the same size and almost triple the power. 

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

There is no Milwaukee with triple the power. Period.

 

There is a Milwaukee  ( fuel gen 2 ) with double the power but also bigger and heavier.

 

The counterpart to Milwaukee fuel gen 2 is Makita dhp481. Which outperforms the Milwaukee slightly.

 

From memory I believe that Milwaukee brushless compact has the exact same power rating as this new compact Makita.

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

Did some fact checking and the compact brushless Milwaukee has a slightly higher power spec to this Makita dhp484 but is also Longer and heavier. 

 

All in all in adds up 🙂

JimboS1iceMember since Sep 2015

kornomaniac wrote:

13 hours ago, kornomaniac said:

Did some fact checking and the compact brushless Milwaukee has a slightly higher power spec to this Makita dhp484 but is also Longer and heavier. 

 

All in all in adds up 🙂

 

But a lot of Makita’s spec lower than Milwaukee but still out perform them

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

True. Milwaukee tend to have slightly less performance in real life tests that their Paper specs would assume 🙂

 

Just like bosch’s Tools imo seem to have abit More real life grunt then their Paper specs would show 🙂

joemontagueMember since May 2016

I love mine

Photo from the original forum

JimboS1iceMember since Sep 2015

kornomaniac wrote:

True. Milwaukee tend to have slightly less performance in real life tests that their Paper specs would assume [emoji4]

 

Just like bosch’s Tools imo seem to have abit More real life grunt then their Paper specs would show [emoji4]


To me Bosch tools are like the Willis Jeeps of the fleet, they may not be the quickest but it can take some shrapnel, drive off a cliff, land upside down and still get the job done


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
danielicrazyMember since Apr 2016

where can I get it in Canada??

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

danielicrazy wrote:

4 hours ago, danielicrazy said:

where can I get it in Canada??

 

Most likely every Makita Dealer? 🙂

danielicrazyMember since Apr 2016

seriously is it under a different code?

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

Ah not sure. America uses different codes. Not sure about Canada 🙂 sorry man !

Makita_2233Member since Aug 2016

danielicrazy wrote:

On 21/12/2016 at 11:39 PM, danielicrazy said:

where can I get it in Canada??

This drill is out in Canada. Dhp484, same part number as Australia. US is different part number 

danielicrazyMember since Apr 2016

I finally found it at atlas machinery,  It only popped up on their site a few days ago.  I got it today and man is it great.  Actually i did see it at home depot just before, but it was in a kit with a dtd153 fast charger and 2x 5ah and the lunch bag  for 500$.  I think this was a home depot holiday special, because i didn’t see that combo anywhere else.  Not bad, but I couldn’t spring that much cash and found the bare tool only at atlas.

 

Anyway, it feels great.  My last drill was the bhp454.  It’s still running, and they have the same listed torque but it was so heavy and long.  This new drill will fit so much better in between studs and joists.  my old drill will be retired to mixing cement probably.

 

I tested it with a 2+ inch self feeding bit.  Worked on low gear, doesn’t even try on high.  I sunk a few 3 inch screws just testing it. I did a little head to head with my old impact btd141.  Even though they have the same listed 2000rpm, my new drill was definitely faster.

 

Before with my bhp484 I would always pick up my impact for screws, but now i’m wondering if my drill will be better,  (it’s definitely quieter)  I know a guy who prefered his drill, he said it felt smoother.  Does anyone else use there drill over impact for screws? 

JronmanMember since May 2016

kornomaniac wrote:

On 12/17/2016 at 11:13 AM, kornomaniac said:

True. Milwaukee tend to have slightly less performance in real life tests that their Paper specs would assume 🙂

 

Just like bosch’s Tools imo seem to have abit More real life grunt then their Paper specs would show 🙂

except when Sparky compared the Milwaukee impact to the DeWALT impact. the Milwaukee won but on paper should lose.

JronmanMember since May 2016

joemontague wrote:

On 12/19/2016 at 2:01 PM, joemontague said:

I love mine

Photo from the original forum

wow a lime green makita impact.

joemontagueMember since May 2016

Jronman wrote:

1 hour ago, Jronman said:

wow a lime green makita impact.

Yea the famous  td170  

JimboS1iceMember since Sep 2015

Jronman wrote:

except when Sparky compared the Milwaukee impact to the DeWALT impact. the Milwaukee won but on paper should lose.


Dewalt hits a little quicker than the Milwaukee but all around I prefer the Milwaukee, but the 887 is a very respectable impact


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BremonMember since Dec 2014

Jronman wrote:

On 2017-01-16 at 10:39 AM, Jronman said:

except when Sparky compared the Milwaukee impact to the DeWALT impact. the Milwaukee won but on paper should lose.

SparkyChannel? That guy might as well use a white lightning bolt as his channel logo. Don’t expect anything red to ever lose on that channel without major qualifiers. I do prefer the 2753 but the 887 is practically identical to it performance wise. 

kornomaniacMember since Oct 2014

Bremon wrote:

19 hours ago, Bremon said:

SparkyChannel? That guy might as well use a white lightning bolt as his channel logo. Don’t expect anything red to ever lose on that channel without major qualifiers. I do prefer the 2753 but the 887 is practically identical to it performance wise. 

Agreed 🙂

JronmanMember since May 2016

Bremon wrote:

22 hours ago, Bremon said:

SparkyChannel? That guy might as well use a white lightning bolt as his channel logo. Don’t expect anything red to ever lose on that channel without major qualifiers. I do prefer the 2753 but the 887 is practically identical to it performance wise. 

There have been a few DeWALT tools that have won.

BremonMember since Dec 2014

Jronman wrote:

1 hour ago, Jronman said:

There have been a few DeWALT tools that have won.

Usually followed by excuses for the red tool or reasons it’s still “a respectable and worthy competitor at the power tool Olympics” (paraphrasing of course). 

JimboS1iceMember since Sep 2015

he never explores outside of red or yellow, you talk about a few of us favoring milwaukee… this guy must be on their pay roll

dmz2084Member since Dec 2014

JimboS1ice wrote:

20 minutes ago, JimboS1ice said:

he never explores outside of red or yellow, you talk about a few of us favoring milwaukee… this guy must be on their pay roll

Well he did “review” a few Makitas a several years ago.

You are the influencer. Post it to 4.4 million followers.

Hit record. We’ll handle the rest.

Upload your review