howabout…
Tstack radio (I know they have a tough system one coming out)
Tstack vacuum: cordless & corded
a “cage” that sits around the cordless miter saw that allows it to be connected into the t-stack system
cordless jig saw with a LED light & vacuum attachment
hard plastic case for track saw tracks
Tstack case that contains all vacuum attachments
trim compressor that clips into t-stack
I’m going to keep trolling for a brushless 7 1/4″ saw. I am invested in Dewalt stuff and if there was one I wouldn’t hesitate.
As mentioned before a revised jigsaw, perhaps with a barrel grip option (it seems like dewalt dropped the corded barrel grip model so I won’t hold my breath).
It would be nice if Dewalt offered kits in Tstaks or tough boxes too.
Lastly a brushless track saw model would be sweet too. Thanks.
I would also like to add a Tstack -to- tough system adapter and vice/versa
I hate how they make you choose between the two… why cant we have both and a combination of them both
Brushless grinder, brushless and more powerful 3/8 impact wrench please!
the new impact wrench no use?john92awd wrote:
Brushless grinder, brushless and more powerful 3/8 impact wrench please!
Turner85 wrote:
the new impact wrench no use?
The new one (dcf899) is too big for alot of uses. I currently use a dcf883 a lot and would love an upgrade
well they never even made the miter saw brushless so I think you’ll be waiting a while for a brushless 7 1/4″ circular saw, but who knows what they are planning to do. I wouldn’t be too happy if they updated the miter saw with a brushless motor after less than a year of it being released though.
Hugh Jass wrote:
That’s a considerable jump, going to eat batteries for breakfast… brushless XR?
I wonder if we will see a higher capacity battery similar to Milwaukee’s 9.0 ah packs.
Hugh Jass wrote:
That’s a considerable jump, going to eat batteries for breakfast… brushless XR?
Going from a 2 pole engine to 4 pole engine, you will not have battery eating saw.. ! 🙂
Does a 4 pole motor use less energy then a 2 pole ? 🙂
I think it’s more efficient with the energy it uses.
Jimbo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In theory, I also belive the efficiency goes up. At least it makes sense in my mind. Given it will have twice as many optimal positions that the rotor will have each turn.
And they are a bit more complex to. Though most non-brushless motors in tools were 4-pole theese days.
Andrull wrote:
In theory, I also belive the efficiency goes up. At least it makes sense in my mind. Given it will have twice as many optimal positions that the rotor will have each turn.
And they are a bit more complex to. Though most non-brushless motors in tools were 4-pole theese days.
That was the key to ridgids gen5x until the brushless variants came out
Jimbo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cool ! Learn something new every day !